Skip to main content

Does anyone think the pouchoscopy biopsy results (from Cleveland) below could indicate pouch ischemia with the biopsy addendum comment reading 'superficial small bowel mucosa'? I also have a blood clot in the left pelvic area they found on an MRI and I am just not sure if all of this, combined with my ongoing stricture is causing all my issues.

As I have indicated before, I never had chronic cuffitis or anal issues like I am now experiencing since the onset of my takedown surgery 18 months ago and I am so concerned all my issues are more surgery trauma related versus autoimmune and I am devastated at the thought of losing my pouch.

I was on cipro for 10 days before having this scope, so I am sure that is why why the results seem to be as good as they are prior to my past scopes with regard to no active inflammation.

I am waiting to hear back from my GI ad Cleveland over these results. Thanks


FINAL DIAGNOSIS

1. Small bowel, biopsy (A) - Small bowel mucosa, without diagnostic abnormality.

2. Pouch body, biopsy (B) - Superficial small bowel mucosa, without diagnostic abnormality, see comment.

3. Anal transitional zone, biopsy (C) - Squamous mucosa and granulation tissue, consistent with ulcer, negative for granulomas or dysplasia.

COMMENT
2. There is no evidence of active inflammation; however, the biopsy shows only superficial small bowel mucosa.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

No, I think you are reading something into this that just is not there. The comment at the end states that only the top mucosa layer (superficial) was presented for biopsy. He is just saying that he cannot comment on what is potentially going on in the deeper layers.

The fact that you only have active inflammation/ulceration at the anal transition zone (ATZ) is a good thing. Not good, in respect that you have it, but the location. Inflammation in the ATZ cannot be used to make a diagnosis of Crohn's, because it is a common site of post op inflammation. So that means that your pouchitis is likely just regular pouchitis (not Crohn's, because it responds well to antibiotics).

However, the ATZ inflammation could be due to ischemia (nothing on the pathology reports supports or rules it out), or it could be due to the stricture, leading to straining, fecal stasis, etc., and causing your symptoms.

The finding of the the thrombosed vein on MRI could very well be a red herring. This is because when you are looking for sources of ischemia, you are looking for arterial problems, not venous. Arteries supply the blood to an organ, and veins drain the blood. You can lose a vein and be OK, since there are collaterals, and over time new ones grow. But, during the acute stage of venous thrombosis, there can be congestion and swelling, until the collaterals grow. I would tend to think that yours is old news from the time of surgery, and not acute. But you should get clarification from your doctors.

It is easy to get worked up over abnormalities found in tests, but it is the doctors' job to make sense of it all and make clinical correllations. If everyone on the street were examined as closely as most of us, they would also find abnormalities, which may or may not be significant. I know you have other issues to be concerned with as well, so it all gets just a little overwhelming, I'm sure. Hope this helps a little.

Jan Smiler

Add Reply

Copyright © 2025 The J-Pouch Group. All rights reserved.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×