Hello everyone,
I've read many posts here about people with failing/inflamed pouches who decided to go back to an ileostomy, and said that it was much better to remove the pouch than to leave it in situ (disconnected), because leaving it can yield many problems.
On the other hand, a surgeon I've just seen suggested that leaving it was also an option worth considering because a) it's a much simpler surgery with less risk, in particular less risk of sexual dysfunction and b) it leaves the possibility to reconnect the pouch later on if some new treatment comes along in the future (eg to "disinflame" the pouch).
Does anyone have an opinion on this ?
Also, is there anyone with Crohn's (like me !) who's chosen to keep the pouch in situ and is happy with the result ?
Thanks very much in advance !
Arnaud
I've read many posts here about people with failing/inflamed pouches who decided to go back to an ileostomy, and said that it was much better to remove the pouch than to leave it in situ (disconnected), because leaving it can yield many problems.
On the other hand, a surgeon I've just seen suggested that leaving it was also an option worth considering because a) it's a much simpler surgery with less risk, in particular less risk of sexual dysfunction and b) it leaves the possibility to reconnect the pouch later on if some new treatment comes along in the future (eg to "disinflame" the pouch).
Does anyone have an opinion on this ?
Also, is there anyone with Crohn's (like me !) who's chosen to keep the pouch in situ and is happy with the result ?
Thanks very much in advance !
Arnaud