Feeling depressed - I had an EUA this week to change seton and the usual pouchoscopy with biopsies. Going into the EUA, I felt my pouchitis symptoms were under control after a couple weeks on tindamax, although I still felt narrowed (surgeon did a dilation). I've been taking canasa and/or anucort off and on (mostly on) for many years. Results:
1. Afferent limb, biopsy (A) - Small intestinal mucosa with focal active
enteritis.
- No evidence of pyloric gland metaplasia, granulomas, or dysplasia.
2. Pouch, biopsy (B) - Small intestinal mucosa with chronic active
enteritis.
- No evidence of pyloric gland metaplasia, granulomas, or dysplasia.
3. Pouch, biopsy (C) - Small intestinal mucosa with chronic active
enteritis, ulcer, pyloric gland metaplasia, and focal non-necrotizing
granulomas.
- No evidence of dysplasia.
4. Anal transitional zone, biopsy (D) - Partially villiform intestinal
mucosa with marked chronic active inflammation, ulcer, and architectural
distortion.
- No evidence of granulomas or dysplasia
Biopsies in the past were always funky, with ulcers, pseudostratification of nuclei; plasmacytosis; granulation tissue; marked chronic active enteritis; mild lymphoid hyperplasia, etc. There was of course, a suspicion that I could have "Crohn's" due to an RV fistula that arises from the dentate line and other symptoms. I've also had "flares" for the last 10+ years that no dr. really could/would explain that I believe were flares of - let's call it - Crohn's. Nasty, flu-like episodes that would go on for weeks+ at a time.
Obviously, it's not a good idea to let things continue as they are, I don't want to risk another fistula and whatever else could come out of this. I plan to see my local G/I guy next month and come up with a plan of treatment. My CC surgeon's recommendation was just to come back in 2-3 yrs. for repeat scoping, no other advice was offered.
Here's my conundrum: I've been considering pouch removal for several years due to the fistula and my "flares", dealing with night accidents and my usual pouch difficulties. Just tired of it all after 23+ years, and had accepted the idea of living with a permanent ileostomy. Discussed removal at length with my surgeon at my pre-EUA appt., and tentatively set a date for early fall '16 (don't want to miss out on gardening season!!)
Any opinions on whether, after this dx., I should NOT have the pouch removed? I understand that the process that causes IBD could very well just find another target in my body to attack, but my thought is that at least with the pouch gone, I wouldn't have to live with the pouch - and hopefully - Crohn's symptoms.
I know there are no crystal balls in this situation, but I wonder if anyone has gone through pouch removal after Crohn's dx and could report as to how that has worked out for you, or if any of you other helpful pouchies could offer insight into going this route.