I originally posted this issue on Healing Well but it was suggested that I put it on j-pouch.org for additional insight...
I've had UC/PSC for 23 years and I've been "fortunate" in that it has been mild and previously easy to manage flares with a quick burst of Prednisone. Latest colonoscopy showed low grade dysplasia for the first time. Doc says that, in someone with over two decades of UC/PSC, LGD is an indicator and there is a high risk of developing cancer. Leads to a recommendation of total proctocolectomy with j-pouch.
Met with surgeon today and he said majority of colectomy candidates are easy to recommend surgery because symptoms are so bad that quality of life will be dramatically improved with surgery. The thing is that I don't feel too bad at all - my symptoms are really mild and I don't have discomfort or urgency. Effectively, if I have surgery my quality of life will be diminished - which is counterintuitive logic for having any kind of surgery. The 0% risk of CRC is why the docs are recommending surgery. But is one test result sufficient to remove the colon?
Has anyone been in a similar situation (US/PSC case history and faced with recommendation for surgery when you don't feel too bad)? Did you defer surgery initially, only to have to go through with it as time progressed?
I have booked surgery for end of this week because my (non-medical) circumstances absolutely require this to be done right away or else delayed 6-12 months minimum - if at all - with ongoing scope surveillance every 3-6 months as alternative course. But I'm now freaking out because I could be one of the 50% (statistically) who never develop cancer in this type of case. and should never have had the surgery!
Any insights are welcome.
Original Post