I have attached my recent pouch biospy results. I am interested in knowing if anyone has any comments regarding the results.
My GI thinks the results look pretty good, but I am concerned about the chronic 'active enteritis' in the pouch biospy. I am wondering why this is not being called crohn's' disease as I have had chronic pouchitis since my takedown 2 years ago and lately I have a lot of upper left abdominal pain. I was off antibiotic for several weeks at the time of scope and just started them yesterday due to increased frequency, constant cramping and pain. Thanks for any input.
1. NEO TERMINAL ILEUM, BIOPSY:
- SMALL BOWEL MUCOSA WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT ABNORMALITY
- NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA
2. POUCH, BIOPSY:
- MILD CHRONIC ACTIVE ENTERITIS
- NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA
3. RECTAL CUFF, BIOPSY:
- SUPERFICIAL FRAGMENTS OF INFLAMED COLONIC MUCOSA WITH FOCAL HYPERPLASTIC CHANGES
- FRAGMENT OF SQUAMOUS MUCOSA WITH ULCERATION AND ACUTE INFLAMMATION
- NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA
My GI thinks the results look pretty good, but I am concerned about the chronic 'active enteritis' in the pouch biospy. I am wondering why this is not being called crohn's' disease as I have had chronic pouchitis since my takedown 2 years ago and lately I have a lot of upper left abdominal pain. I was off antibiotic for several weeks at the time of scope and just started them yesterday due to increased frequency, constant cramping and pain. Thanks for any input.
1. NEO TERMINAL ILEUM, BIOPSY:
- SMALL BOWEL MUCOSA WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT ABNORMALITY
- NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA
2. POUCH, BIOPSY:
- MILD CHRONIC ACTIVE ENTERITIS
- NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA
3. RECTAL CUFF, BIOPSY:
- SUPERFICIAL FRAGMENTS OF INFLAMED COLONIC MUCOSA WITH FOCAL HYPERPLASTIC CHANGES
- FRAGMENT OF SQUAMOUS MUCOSA WITH ULCERATION AND ACUTE INFLAMMATION
- NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA