The Problem: Symptomatic proctitis (cuffitis) in an excessively long anorectal stump.
If the anastomosis is truly at the level of the anal canal, the amount of mucosa retained is so minimal that cuffitis is unlikely to be a true entity. Symptomatic disease is the result of an anastomosis performed ( a little higher) too high, in the distal rectum, rather than at the top of the anal canal, leading to retention of (more than the minimum) too much rectum and its associated mucosal disease. Symptoms are those of proctitis. (Mark P. Callery Handbook of re-operative general surgery Blackwell. The level of anastomosis is identified by digital examination; endoscopy with biopsies confirms the diagnosis).
The Solution:
Option 1: Pouch advancement surgery with mucosectomy done perianally / transanally. A sphincter-preserving perineal approach to mobilize the pouch is used . It allows excision of the inflamed or dysplastic-retained anorectal mucosa, followed by pouch advancement and a neoileoanal anastomosis. The surgery is successful with a small chance of infection that the surgeon will watch for and be proactive with by introducing antibiotics prior to surgery. In this surgery the pouch is moved down lower (they can't do this in the original surgery, but overtime, the pouch are expands and they can actually move it down lower down). Research shows that Pouch advancement or local perianal repair yielded better results than did pouch reconstruction. (SEE: Fazio VW, Tjandra JJ. Transanal mucosectomy. Ileal pouch advancement for anorectal dysplasia or inflammation after restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994 Oct;37(10):1008-11. This report illustrates the relative ease and safety of delayed mucosectomy via a perineal approach, provided that the initially stapled anastomosis is within 3 cm to 4 cm of the dentate line. This technique also obviates the need for complex abdominopelvic surgery after previous restorative proctocolectomy. alSO see: Zmora O, Efron JE, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, Wexner SD.Reoperative abdominal and perineal surgery in ileoanal pouch patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Sep;44(9):1310-4).
Option 2: Topical treatments are attempted first but if these fail, surgical intervention is indicated. An endocanal approach with mucosectomy and advancement of the pouch is rarely possible, as the nature of the diagnosis generally means anastomosis is too high to reach for this approach. A combined abdominal approach is best, with mobilization of the pouch past the level of the anastomosis, ensuring the full mobilization is performed to the level of the pelvic floor. A mucosectomy and hand –sewn anastomosis is then performed. In a series of 22 patients, successful outcome with reduced frequency and improved quality of life occurred in 15 of 22 patients. The most successful approach to this problem is to ensure that it does not occur in the first place, by creating a stapled anastomosis truly at the top of the anal canal, or by performing mucosectomy. (Surgery is the second option because the anal sphicture stretch is considerable and protracted (20-30 min) when hand sewn tech. with mucosectomy are used, and this produces significant and prolonged reduction in resting sphincture tone that is associated with higher rates (compared to stapled IPAA) of nocturnal incontinence and pad usage by patients).
Q: What should be done if cuffitis is found before the take down surgery ? Shall we go for a re-operation using hand sewn tech. or just go ahead with the takedown while continuing to take the topical medicines for the rest of the life. What if, after a few months or years, the problem (cuffitis) turns out to be too severe to be adequately managed by medicines?
If the anastomosis is truly at the level of the anal canal, the amount of mucosa retained is so minimal that cuffitis is unlikely to be a true entity. Symptomatic disease is the result of an anastomosis performed ( a little higher) too high, in the distal rectum, rather than at the top of the anal canal, leading to retention of (more than the minimum) too much rectum and its associated mucosal disease. Symptoms are those of proctitis. (Mark P. Callery Handbook of re-operative general surgery Blackwell. The level of anastomosis is identified by digital examination; endoscopy with biopsies confirms the diagnosis).
The Solution:
Option 1: Pouch advancement surgery with mucosectomy done perianally / transanally. A sphincter-preserving perineal approach to mobilize the pouch is used . It allows excision of the inflamed or dysplastic-retained anorectal mucosa, followed by pouch advancement and a neoileoanal anastomosis. The surgery is successful with a small chance of infection that the surgeon will watch for and be proactive with by introducing antibiotics prior to surgery. In this surgery the pouch is moved down lower (they can't do this in the original surgery, but overtime, the pouch are expands and they can actually move it down lower down). Research shows that Pouch advancement or local perianal repair yielded better results than did pouch reconstruction. (SEE: Fazio VW, Tjandra JJ. Transanal mucosectomy. Ileal pouch advancement for anorectal dysplasia or inflammation after restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994 Oct;37(10):1008-11. This report illustrates the relative ease and safety of delayed mucosectomy via a perineal approach, provided that the initially stapled anastomosis is within 3 cm to 4 cm of the dentate line. This technique also obviates the need for complex abdominopelvic surgery after previous restorative proctocolectomy. alSO see: Zmora O, Efron JE, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, Wexner SD.Reoperative abdominal and perineal surgery in ileoanal pouch patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Sep;44(9):1310-4).
Option 2: Topical treatments are attempted first but if these fail, surgical intervention is indicated. An endocanal approach with mucosectomy and advancement of the pouch is rarely possible, as the nature of the diagnosis generally means anastomosis is too high to reach for this approach. A combined abdominal approach is best, with mobilization of the pouch past the level of the anastomosis, ensuring the full mobilization is performed to the level of the pelvic floor. A mucosectomy and hand –sewn anastomosis is then performed. In a series of 22 patients, successful outcome with reduced frequency and improved quality of life occurred in 15 of 22 patients. The most successful approach to this problem is to ensure that it does not occur in the first place, by creating a stapled anastomosis truly at the top of the anal canal, or by performing mucosectomy. (Surgery is the second option because the anal sphicture stretch is considerable and protracted (20-30 min) when hand sewn tech. with mucosectomy are used, and this produces significant and prolonged reduction in resting sphincture tone that is associated with higher rates (compared to stapled IPAA) of nocturnal incontinence and pad usage by patients).
Q: What should be done if cuffitis is found before the take down surgery ? Shall we go for a re-operation using hand sewn tech. or just go ahead with the takedown while continuing to take the topical medicines for the rest of the life. What if, after a few months or years, the problem (cuffitis) turns out to be too severe to be adequately managed by medicines?