Reply to "Can this surgery be done without giving blood transfusions?"

The incision is not where you bleed. It is internal, where they remove the rectum (at least that is the most risky place). So, laparoscopy may not make that much difference. In all likelihood, transfusion won't be necessary anyway. It is not a typical thing. The banking of blood is more of a precaution than a "need." But, you need to have it all planned out in advance for the contingencies.

I was not adverse to transfusions, but wanted designated donor blood (because I was too sick to donate for myself). I went through surgery fine, although got pretty low in my blood counts. It was the complications afterwards, with a presacral abscess and further dropping of my hemoglobin that caused me to need transfusions. And wouldn't you know it? It was the day after the designated donor blood expired and got tossed! So, I wound up getting anonymous donor blood anyway.

We all have to choose our own paths, and who are we to decide what is right for you? The main thing is that your surgical team is on the same page and you are willing to assume the risks.

Jan